Source |
Consider these quotes where the terms around 'a priori' (such as priori concept) has been replaced with "mental model"
Unless we apply the concepts of space and time to the impressions we receive, the world is unintelligible, just a kaleidoscopic jumble of colors and patterns and noises and smells and pain and tastes without meaning. We sense objects in a certain way because of our application of mental models such as space and time, but we do not create these objects out of our imagination, as pure philosophical idealists would maintain. The forms of space and time are applied to data as they are received from the object producing them. The metal models have their origins in human nature so that they're neither caused by the sensed object nor bring it into being, but provide a kind of screening function for what sense data we will accept.and
Kant called his thesis that our mental model are independent of sense data and screen what we see a ``Copernican revolution.'' By this he referred to Copernicus' statement that the earth moves around the sun. Nothing changed as a result of this revolution, and yet everything changed. Or, to put it in Kantian terms, the objective world producing our sense data did not change, but our mental model of it was turned inside out. The effect was overwhelming. It was the acceptance of the Copernican revolution that distinguishes modern man from his medieval predecessors.
What Copernicus did was take the existing mental model of the world, the notion that it was flat and fixed in space, and pose an alternative mental model of the world, that it's spherical and moves around the sun; and showed that both of the mental models fitted the existing sensory data.
Of course - a mental model is a pattern of thought, which means that it is part of the pattern of sentience. This needs to be added to the Sentience Theory wiki I'm developing.